ISIS and Islam: The Ugly Truth
By Dr. Ashraf Ezzat
The world
has not seen such brutality and savagery in
modern times. Horrible Stories were told about
the Celts, the Aztecs and the Mongols;
nevertheless they always remained stories of the
remote past. But what the militants of the so
called “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria – ISIS”
are doing is something else, what they are
perpetrating defy any literary power to try and
put it into words.
Driven
by what they see as divine command and wreaking
havoc and devastation only thought possible in
Hollywood productions the Islamic militant group
ISIS has pushed the definition of terrorism to a
new and scary limit.
Their
ongoing banquet of carnage has to be seen, not
only to be believed but to grasp how religion,
that should have united humans in peace, could
turn into a license to lawless slaughter. (Watch
this extremely graphic video of ISIS brutal mass
execution of Iraqi civilians and soldiers –
watch at your discretion)
Contrary to what most commentators have said, it
is not the graphic scenes of mass execution and
beheading of hundreds of innocent civilians by
ISIS that I find most repulsive, the American
war on Iraq has left thousands killed in cold
blood and countless numbers born with anomalies
caused by US radioactive lethal weaponry
(Hi-tech savagery that often go unreported by
MSM)
What I
personally find really scary in the ISIS
militants is that they carry out their onslaught
seemingly without any shred of guilt or shame.
The militants/Mujahideen go about their business
as usual; beheading their opponents’ minutes
after they fall into their captivity. And
minutes later they all go and join each other in
a humble prayer to god.
Following
the scripture literally
Now
what’s interesting, or rather shocking, is the
fact that those hideous acts of terrorism are
executed by people who claim they are devout
Muslims.
I know
that the whole world, including the Islamic
world, is viewing ISIS Mujahideen as the
ultimate example of brutal terrorism and modern
time’s savagery.
But
this world view doesn’t concern me as much as
how those Muslim terrorists really view
themselves. Moreover, why a supposedly devout
Muslim would/should end up as a global terrorist
just for merely doing what his faith oblige him
to undertake.
Ladies
and gents, regardless of who is funding ISIS and
the fact that many of their militants, including
Abu Bakr El Baghdadi have been trained in
US military base in Jordan and maybe some of
their top leaders have been also recruited by
CIA, one fact remains so obvious and yet so
bewildering.
Those ruthless ISIS terrorists sincerely believe they are pious devotees of Islam’s god “Allah” and that they act according to his holy scripture “Quran” and they are the true followers of his prophet “Mohamed”
You
won’t believe this but in a strange way those
ISIS terrorists are telling the truth, or what
they were made to believe is the truth.
The
ugly truth is that ISIS terrorists are acting
literally according to some of the many Quran’s
verses that incite fighting and killing
non-Muslims in almost cold-blooded way.
“Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.” Quran (2:216)
Now,
and before we elaborate any further, let’s get
this one thing about Quran straight. Like
Judaism, Islam is a religion of laws. Actually
Judaism and Islam are so much alike the Quran,
not the Christian Bible, should be labeled “The
New Testament” … after all, both Quran and the
Tanakh are the product of the same Arabic
nomadic culture (A topic expanded upon in
upcoming series of articles)
While
the Gospels of Christianity have been
influenced/softened by the
Greco-Roman philosophy and separated from
the state by the power of Jesus’ famous line
“”Render unto Caesar the things that are
Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are
God’s” The Tanakh and Quran kept their strong
tribal culture and binding laws unmitigated over
the centuries.
As a
Christian, as long as you believe in Jesus
Christ, you only need the scripture as a
spiritual guideline but in Judaism and Islam
you’re bound by the canon of your faith to
embrace their rules as the instruction book of
your day to day life.
The
Hebrew/Muslim laws tell their followers what to
eat and what not to eat and drink, how to get
married, how to get divorced, how to get into
the bathroom … and yes how and when to kill the
non-believers.
The key point here is how should the Holy Scripture especially those of Islam be interpreted? The verses of any holy scripture should be interpreted in accordance with their historical context, but that is not what the Muslims, at least nowadays, do. (This is the focal source of all extremism and terrorism)
Islam’s
dilemma
The
dilemma of Islam, it has been for a while
actually, is that its theologians, Imams and
clerics refuse/fail to view the scripture,
especially the verses that promote fighting and
jihad, within the frame of its historical
context.
They’d
rather keep them open-ended as part of an
eternal and always relevant words of Allah. Most
conservative Muslim clerics are under the
impression that binding many of the verses to
its historicity might restrain the authority of
a big chunk of the scripture, and consequently
the influence of the Islamic clergy.
This dilemma has been ignored for centuries, thus paving more ways and opening more doors for ultra-conservative literalism, also known as fundamentalism (closest backdoor to violence and terrorism)
That
said, the more any Muslim conservative reads
verses from Quran and memorize
Hadith (sayings) by prophet Mohamed, the
more he is likely to take it absolutely
literally and automatically apply it to his
current life and affairs. (Not to mention that
piles of Hadith are of doubtful source and
purpose)
“Soon shall we cast terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”. Quran (3:151)
If we
to interpret the above verse in its historical
context we will learn that some Pagan tribes of
the Arab Peninsula were terrified and finally
defeated by the raids of Mohamed and his
followers back in the early seventh century.
But if
we to interpret it literally and maybe relevant
to the present point in time, then we are
talking about ISIS mujahideen casting terror, by
mass execution and beheading like the early
Muslim fighters used to do, into the hearts of
the followers of the infidels Bashar Al-Assad of
Syria and Al- Maliki of Iraq, for they ruled not
according to Islamic Sharia.
Do you see how terrifyingly simple this is, and how terrifyingly complicated this has become?
At this
point in my article I expect many to be offended
by my candid exposition and they might try and
refute my thesis by irritably commenting “Early
Muslims and Mujahideen never killed fellow
Muslims” and my reply would be “yes they did;
Sunnis killed Shia in
Karbala (680 A.D) and a bloody perpetual
conflict between the two sects has ensued ever
since till this very day. (Not to mention the
massacres perpetrated by
Umayyad and
Abbasid caliphates)
Bad Dogma
While
everybody is agitatedly following the news and
videos of ISIS, nobody is asking the logical
question “How did such a group of dangerous
fanatics create in the first place?
ISIS
has created not only due to militarization by US
army nor recruitment by CIA but primarily
because of misinterpreted scripture and bad
dogma.
Another ugly truth is the fact that early Muslims of the Arab Peninsula, during and following the death of Mohamed, were so brutal in their fighting and raids.
The
early Muslims “Sahabah”
were economically desperate; as a newly formed
community they needed money and craved for
influence so they began by
raiding trade caravans in the Peninsula (the
ancient spices and incense road) and ended up
raiding Persian, Roman and Egyptian territories.
Beheading the enemies, as a means to evoke fear, was a common practice in the ancient Arabian tribal wars. Khalid Bin Walid, the military commander of the early days of the Islamic state never hesitated to behead the fighters of his enemies.
The
Islamic
records reveal that Bin Walid after the
battle of Ullais 633 A.D, aka the battle of
blood river, spent a whole day and night
beheading 7000 soldiers and dumping them in the
river(flowing it with their blood) in rejoice
and gratitude for Allah’s brought-victory over
the Persians.
Submit to Islam and be safe. Or agree to the payment of the Jizya, and you and your people will be under our protection, else you will have only yourself to blame for the consequences, for I bring the men who desire death as ardently as you desire life. (Khalid Bin Walid’s letter to the Sassanid Persians before he raided their empire – very similar to ISIS raid threats)
Now,
could you see the example ISIS mujahidin are
following. What ISIS did to the Christians of
Mosul is no different than what Bin Walid had
earlier done, with the blessings of Islam’s
Caliphate at the time, to the Christians of the
Sassanid Empire.
Contrary
to what the clergy or Islamic media claim, ISIS
and Al Qaeda is not the exception, the millions
of so called moderate Muslims around the world
are.
Those
fundamentalist Islamists who are casting terror
into the heart of the civilized world are but a
copycat of the mujahidin of early Islam. Whether
we like it or not this is the ugly truth.
The
reason why the majority of Muslims does not act
like ISIS nor condone its crimes is because
those millions of the so called moderate Muslims
have not been prone to fundamentalist Islamic
teaching through indoctrination (intellectual
hypnosis)
Once
they are, even if they were brought up in
western communities, a considerable faction of
them especially those with assimilation and
economic problems will turn into dogmatic
Jihadists ready to be recruited by ISIS.
Another important factor that many tend to overlook is that the majority of world’s Muslims act according to preconceptions that their own indigenous culture and traditions have mainly contributed to and not only Islam. Hence the term “moderate Muslims” denotes an attitude/mindset brought about by a blend between different cultures, be it Egyptian, Syrian or Persian and Islam.
And
indeed that intercultural blend is the reason
why the fundamentalist and harsh Bedouin side of
Islam has been ameliorated enough to allow
millions of Muslims to coexist with their fellow
men of other creeds and theology over the long
centuries.
Reforming
Islam
ISIS
could be a peril to Islam’s reputation and
future around the world, but there is a good
flip-side to this situation. Never before in
recent times have the Muslim clergy had the
opportunity and the imperative to embark on
reforming Islam.
Jihadist groups and the rise of political Islam won’t be eradicated or even curbed by air power and drone attacks. ISIS, Al Qaeda, al-Nusra front and Muslim Brotherhood won’t be dismantled except by reforming and changing the mainstream narrative of Islam. For Muslims, nothing short of that will be like burying their heads in the sand.
ISIS is
a reason enough for high profile Muslim scholars
to start purifying the Hadith from tons of
controversial sayings and teachings, doing more
harm than good, claimed to have been told by
Mohamed.
ISIS is
a reason enough to start a new approach in
interpreting the Quran’s verses especially those
narrating the chronicles of Mohamed and
followers’ battles against pagans.
Launching a new school of credible and enlightened Muslim scholars that will respect the historical context of the scripture verses is the first step toward reforming Islam.
This
couldn’t have been more urgent a time, for world
Muslims have been leaning dangerously towards
fundamentalism and extremism throughout the last
80 years (ever since the establishment of Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt and following the rise of
Wahhabi tide in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan)
If this
rare opportunity for reforming Islam passed
unnoticed and unexploited, then we will suffer
from endless and more powerful tides of
fundamentalist Jihadist groups.
And we
have to beware of the fact that the groups that
will follow ISIS will be more cruel and tougher
and they will definitely attract huge numbers of
mujahideen, so huge no military coalition will
be able to break them down.
Most
probably the current coalition led by US will be
able to dismantle ISIS militarily but not
ideologically. The task of dismantling ISIS bad
ideas and dangerous dogma is the vital battle
that Muslims themselves led by their scholars
and clergy should undertake.
Ashraf Ezzat comes from
Egypt, the dwelling land of the gods, and works
as a medical doctor but writing has always been
one of his passions.
amenhotep.55@gmail.com -
http://ashraf62.wordpress.com
Comments
Post a Comment