The War on Democracy
How corporations and spy agencies use "security" to defend 
					profiteering and crush activism
					
By Nafeez Ahmed
November 29, 2013 - "The Guardian" - A stunning new report compiles extensive evidence showing how some of the world's largest corporations have partnered with private intelligence firms and government intelligence agencies to spy on activist and nonprofit groups. Environmental activism is a prominent though not exclusive focus of these activities.
 
					
The report argues that a key precondition for corporate espionage is that the nonprofit in question:
By Nafeez Ahmed
November 29, 2013 - "The Guardian" - A stunning new report compiles extensive evidence showing how some of the world's largest corporations have partnered with private intelligence firms and government intelligence agencies to spy on activist and nonprofit groups. Environmental activism is a prominent though not exclusive focus of these activities.
The
					
					report by the Center for Corporate Policy (CCP) in 
					Washington DC titled Spooky Business: Corporate
					
					Espionage against Nonprofit Organizations draws on 
					a wide range of public record evidence, including lawsuits 
					and journalistic investigations. It paints a disturbing 
					picture of a global corporate espionage programme that is 
					out of control, with possibly as much as one in four 
					activists being private spies. 
The report argues that a key precondition for corporate espionage is that the nonprofit in question:
"... impairs or at least threatens a company's assets or image sufficiently."
One of 
					the groups that has been targeted the most, and by a range 
					of different corporations, is Greenpeace. In the 1990s, 
					Greenpeace was tracked by private security firm Beckett 
					Brown International (BBI) on behalf of the world's largest 
					chlorine producer, Dow Chemical, due to the environmental 
					organisation's campaigning against the use of chlorine to 
					manufacture paper and plastics. The spying included: 
					
"... pilfering documents from trash bins, attempting to plant undercover operatives within groups, casing offices, collecting phone records of activists, and penetrating confidential meetings."
Other 
					Greenpeace offices in France and Europe were hacked and 
					spied on by French private intelligence firms at the behest 
					of Électricité de France, the world's largest operator of 
					nuclear power plants, 85% owned by the French government.
Oil 
					companies Shell and BP had also reportedly hired Hackluyt, a 
					private investigative firm with "close links" to MI6, to 
					infiltrate Greenpeace by planting an agent who "posed as a 
					left -wing sympathiser and film maker." His mission was to 
					"betray plans of Greenpeace's activities against oil 
					giants," including gathering "information about the 
					movements of the motor vessel Greenpeace in the north 
					Atlantic."
The 
					CCP report notes that: 
"A diverse array of nonprofits have been targeted by espionage, including environmental, anti-war, public interest, consumer, food safety, pesticide reform, nursing home reform, gun control, social justice, animal rights and arms control groups.
Many of the world's largest corporations and their trade associations - including the US Chamber of Commerce, Walmart, Monsanto, Bank of America, Dow Chemical, Kraft, Coca-Cola, Chevron, Burger King, McDonald's, Shell, BP, BAE, Sasol, Brown & Williamson and E.ON - have been linked to espionage or planned espionage against nonprofit organizations, activists and whistleblowers."
					Exploring other examples of this activity, the report notes 
					that in Ecuador, after a lawsuit against Texaco triggering a 
					$9.5 billion fine for spilling 350 million gallons of oil 
					around Lago Agrio, the private investigations firm Kroll 
					tried to hire journalist Mary Cuddehe as a "corporate spy" 
					for Chevron, to undermine studies of the environmental 
					health effects of the spill.
					Referring to the work of US investigative reporter Jeremy 
					Scahill, the report points out that the notorious defence 
					contractor Blackwater, later renamed XE Services and now 
					Academi, had sought to become "the intel arm" of Monsanto, 
					the agricultural and biotechnology corporation associated 
					with genetically modified foods. Blackwater was paid to 
					"provide operatives to infiltrate activist groups organizing 
					against the multinational biotech firm."
In 
					another case, the UK's Camp for Climate Action, which 
					supports the decommissioning of coal-fired plants, was 
					infiltrated by private security firm Vericola on behalf of 
					three energy companies, E.ON, Scottish Power, and Scottish 
					Resources Group.
					Reviewing emails released by Wikileaks from the Texas-based 
					private intelligence firm Stratfor, the report shows how the 
					firm reportedly "conducted espionage against human rights, 
					animal rights and environmental groups, on behalf of 
					companies such as Coca-Cola." In one case, the emails 
					suggest that Stratfor investigated People for the Ethical 
					Treatment of Animals (PETA) at Coca-Cola's request, and had 
					access to a classified
					
					FBI investigation on PETA.
The 
					report uncovers compelling evidence that much corporate 
					espionage is facilitated by government agencies, 
					particularly the FBI. The CCP report examines a September 
					2010 document from the Office of the Inspector General in 
					the US Justice Department, which reviewed FBI investigations 
					between 2001 and 2006. It concluded that:
"... the factual basis of opening some of the investigations of individuals affiliated with the groups was factually weak... In some cases, we also found that the FBI extended the duration of investigations involving advocacy groups or their members without adequate basis…. In some cases, the FBI classified some of its investigations relating to nonviolent civil disobedience under its 'Acts of Terrorism' classification."
For 
					instance, on an FBI investigation of Greenpeace, the Justice 
					Department found that: 
"... the FBI articulated little or no basis for suspecting a violation of any federal criminal statute... the FBI's opening EC [electronic communication] did not articulate any basis to suspect that they were planning any federal crimes….We also found that the FBI kept this investigation open for over 3 years, long past the corporate shareholder meetings that the subjects were supposedly planning to disrupt... We concluded that the investigation was kept open 'beyond the point at which its underlying justification no longer existed,' which was inconsistent with the FBI's Manual of Investigative and Operational Guidelines (MIOG)."
The 
					FBI's involvement in corporate espionage has been 
					institutionalised through 'InfraGard', "a little-known 
					partnership between private industry, the FBI and the 
					Department of Homeland Security." The partnership involves 
					the participation of "more than 23,000 representatives of 
					private industry," including 350 of the Fortune 500 
					companies. 
But 
					it's not just the FBI. According to the new report, 
					"active-duty
					
					CIA operatives are allowed to sell their expertise to 
					the highest bidder", a policy that gives "financial firms 
					and hedge funds access to the nation's top-level 
					intelligence talent. Little is known about the CIA's 
					moonlighting policy, or which corporations have hired 
					current CIA operatives."
The 
					report concludes that, due to an extreme lack of oversight, 
					government effectively tends to simply "rubber stamp" such 
					intelligence outsourcing: 
"In effect, corporations are now able to replicate in miniature the services of a private CIA, employing active-duty and retired officers from intelligence and/or law enforcement. Lawlessness committed by this private intelligence and law enforcement capacity, which appears to enjoy near impunity, is a threat to democracy and the rule of law. In essence, corporations are now able to hire a private law enforcement capacity - which is barely constrained by legal and ethical norms - and use it to subvert or destroy civic groups. This greatly erodes the capacity of the civic sector to countervail the tremendous power of corporate and wealthy elites."
Gary 
					Ruskin, author of the report, said: 
"Corporate espionage against nonprofit organizations is an egregious abuse of corporate power that is subverting democracy. Who will rein in the forces of corporate lawlessness as they bear down upon nonprofit defenders of justice?"
That's 
					a good question. Ironically, many of the same companies 
					spearheading the war on democracy are also at war with 
					planet earth - just last week the
					
					Guardian revealed that 90 of some of the biggest 
					corporations generate nearly two-thirds of greenhouse gas 
					emissions and are thus overwhelmingly responsible for 
					climate change.
					Dr 
					Nafeez Ahmed is executive director 
					of the Institute for 
					Policy Research & Development and author of
					A User's 
					Guide to the Crisis of Civilisation: And How to Save It 
					among other books. Follow him on Twitter 
					@nafeezahmed
© 2013 
				Guardian News and Media Limited
 
Comments
Post a Comment