The War on Democracy
How corporations and spy agencies use "security" to defend
profiteering and crush activism
By Nafeez Ahmed
November 29, 2013 - "The Guardian" - A stunning new report compiles extensive evidence showing how some of the world's largest corporations have partnered with private intelligence firms and government intelligence agencies to spy on activist and nonprofit groups. Environmental activism is a prominent though not exclusive focus of these activities.
The report argues that a key precondition for corporate espionage is that the nonprofit in question:
By Nafeez Ahmed
November 29, 2013 - "The Guardian" - A stunning new report compiles extensive evidence showing how some of the world's largest corporations have partnered with private intelligence firms and government intelligence agencies to spy on activist and nonprofit groups. Environmental activism is a prominent though not exclusive focus of these activities.
The
report by the Center for Corporate Policy (CCP) in
Washington DC titled Spooky Business: Corporate
Espionage against Nonprofit Organizations draws on
a wide range of public record evidence, including lawsuits
and journalistic investigations. It paints a disturbing
picture of a global corporate espionage programme that is
out of control, with possibly as much as one in four
activists being private spies.
The report argues that a key precondition for corporate espionage is that the nonprofit in question:
"... impairs or at least threatens a company's assets or image sufficiently."
One of
the groups that has been targeted the most, and by a range
of different corporations, is Greenpeace. In the 1990s,
Greenpeace was tracked by private security firm Beckett
Brown International (BBI) on behalf of the world's largest
chlorine producer, Dow Chemical, due to the environmental
organisation's campaigning against the use of chlorine to
manufacture paper and plastics. The spying included:
"... pilfering documents from trash bins, attempting to plant undercover operatives within groups, casing offices, collecting phone records of activists, and penetrating confidential meetings."
Other
Greenpeace offices in France and Europe were hacked and
spied on by French private intelligence firms at the behest
of Électricité de France, the world's largest operator of
nuclear power plants, 85% owned by the French government.
Oil
companies Shell and BP had also reportedly hired Hackluyt, a
private investigative firm with "close links" to MI6, to
infiltrate Greenpeace by planting an agent who "posed as a
left -wing sympathiser and film maker." His mission was to
"betray plans of Greenpeace's activities against oil
giants," including gathering "information about the
movements of the motor vessel Greenpeace in the north
Atlantic."
The
CCP report notes that:
"A diverse array of nonprofits have been targeted by espionage, including environmental, anti-war, public interest, consumer, food safety, pesticide reform, nursing home reform, gun control, social justice, animal rights and arms control groups.
Many of the world's largest corporations and their trade associations - including the US Chamber of Commerce, Walmart, Monsanto, Bank of America, Dow Chemical, Kraft, Coca-Cola, Chevron, Burger King, McDonald's, Shell, BP, BAE, Sasol, Brown & Williamson and E.ON - have been linked to espionage or planned espionage against nonprofit organizations, activists and whistleblowers."
Exploring other examples of this activity, the report notes
that in Ecuador, after a lawsuit against Texaco triggering a
$9.5 billion fine for spilling 350 million gallons of oil
around Lago Agrio, the private investigations firm Kroll
tried to hire journalist Mary Cuddehe as a "corporate spy"
for Chevron, to undermine studies of the environmental
health effects of the spill.
Referring to the work of US investigative reporter Jeremy
Scahill, the report points out that the notorious defence
contractor Blackwater, later renamed XE Services and now
Academi, had sought to become "the intel arm" of Monsanto,
the agricultural and biotechnology corporation associated
with genetically modified foods. Blackwater was paid to
"provide operatives to infiltrate activist groups organizing
against the multinational biotech firm."
In
another case, the UK's Camp for Climate Action, which
supports the decommissioning of coal-fired plants, was
infiltrated by private security firm Vericola on behalf of
three energy companies, E.ON, Scottish Power, and Scottish
Resources Group.
Reviewing emails released by Wikileaks from the Texas-based
private intelligence firm Stratfor, the report shows how the
firm reportedly "conducted espionage against human rights,
animal rights and environmental groups, on behalf of
companies such as Coca-Cola." In one case, the emails
suggest that Stratfor investigated People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals (PETA) at Coca-Cola's request, and had
access to a classified
FBI investigation on PETA.
The
report uncovers compelling evidence that much corporate
espionage is facilitated by government agencies,
particularly the FBI. The CCP report examines a September
2010 document from the Office of the Inspector General in
the US Justice Department, which reviewed FBI investigations
between 2001 and 2006. It concluded that:
"... the factual basis of opening some of the investigations of individuals affiliated with the groups was factually weak... In some cases, we also found that the FBI extended the duration of investigations involving advocacy groups or their members without adequate basis…. In some cases, the FBI classified some of its investigations relating to nonviolent civil disobedience under its 'Acts of Terrorism' classification."
For
instance, on an FBI investigation of Greenpeace, the Justice
Department found that:
"... the FBI articulated little or no basis for suspecting a violation of any federal criminal statute... the FBI's opening EC [electronic communication] did not articulate any basis to suspect that they were planning any federal crimes….We also found that the FBI kept this investigation open for over 3 years, long past the corporate shareholder meetings that the subjects were supposedly planning to disrupt... We concluded that the investigation was kept open 'beyond the point at which its underlying justification no longer existed,' which was inconsistent with the FBI's Manual of Investigative and Operational Guidelines (MIOG)."
The
FBI's involvement in corporate espionage has been
institutionalised through 'InfraGard', "a little-known
partnership between private industry, the FBI and the
Department of Homeland Security." The partnership involves
the participation of "more than 23,000 representatives of
private industry," including 350 of the Fortune 500
companies.
But
it's not just the FBI. According to the new report,
"active-duty
CIA operatives are allowed to sell their expertise to
the highest bidder", a policy that gives "financial firms
and hedge funds access to the nation's top-level
intelligence talent. Little is known about the CIA's
moonlighting policy, or which corporations have hired
current CIA operatives."
The
report concludes that, due to an extreme lack of oversight,
government effectively tends to simply "rubber stamp" such
intelligence outsourcing:
"In effect, corporations are now able to replicate in miniature the services of a private CIA, employing active-duty and retired officers from intelligence and/or law enforcement. Lawlessness committed by this private intelligence and law enforcement capacity, which appears to enjoy near impunity, is a threat to democracy and the rule of law. In essence, corporations are now able to hire a private law enforcement capacity - which is barely constrained by legal and ethical norms - and use it to subvert or destroy civic groups. This greatly erodes the capacity of the civic sector to countervail the tremendous power of corporate and wealthy elites."
Gary
Ruskin, author of the report, said:
"Corporate espionage against nonprofit organizations is an egregious abuse of corporate power that is subverting democracy. Who will rein in the forces of corporate lawlessness as they bear down upon nonprofit defenders of justice?"
That's
a good question. Ironically, many of the same companies
spearheading the war on democracy are also at war with
planet earth - just last week the
Guardian revealed that 90 of some of the biggest
corporations generate nearly two-thirds of greenhouse gas
emissions and are thus overwhelmingly responsible for
climate change.
Dr
Nafeez Ahmed is executive director
of the Institute for
Policy Research & Development and author of
A User's
Guide to the Crisis of Civilisation: And How to Save It
among other books. Follow him on Twitter
@nafeezahmed
© 2013
Guardian News and Media Limited
Comments
Post a Comment