Skip to main content

Silence: A Relationship Killer

Why silence can be more crippling to a relationship than arguments 
 
4
Share
Over the many years that I’ve been practicing therapy, I’ve found that couples that are struggling in their relationships often succumb to the default mode of silence. Sometimes, it’s one person who defers to the unspoken, and at times it’s actually both. In either circumstance, such silence—not a healthy pause or meditative break—speaks to the absence of verbal and emotional intimacy. Unless we’re communicating on levels of extra sensory perception or body language, words are the only tools available to us to communicate let alone resolve our issues. There’s little sense to being in a relationship and resorting to silence. Not only does it sabotage the lifeline of a healthy coupling, it chokes your expressive needs.


When you can express what you’re feeling—in the moment that you’re experiencing it—there’s much less likelihood that you’ll act out on that feeling. Problematic feelings that go unexpressed tend to percolate and boil over—they take on energy of their own, and the ensuing conflict hours or days later may have little correlation to the original emotional insult. When this occurs there’s little chance of being validated, as there may be little correspondence between your hurt feelings and the disruption of the moment.

Telling someone that you feel angry, and explaining why you do, will ordinarily sever the reactive state of being angry or acting angrily. Furthermore, the non-verbalization and suppression of your feelings will—over time—result in substantial resentment, with the accompanying behavior that we might expect. If you don’t share your problematic feelings, there is a great probability that you’ll act out on them, in any number of unrelated ways. Having done so, you now become the problem in the other’s eyes. We’ve now entered into a negative spiral of silence and struggle.
 
Silence is Controlling

When we think of controlling people, we ordinarily conjure images of loud or aggressive individuals. They may, in fact, appear to be bullying and controlling of others. Yet we know exactly what we’re dealing with. There are no surprises. There’s a much more insidious type of control, however, which is predicated upon silence. When we don’t share our thoughts with each other, we are often doing so to control the other’s reactions and behavior. If they don’t know what we’re contemplating, then they can’t possibly respond. At times, people who are inclined to please others or avoid confrontation fall prey to this dilemma. The tendency is to choose silence rather than upset the other party.

When we resort to silence, we create an internal monologue, typically ascribing onto others our projection of how we assume they would respond if we actually shared our thoughts with them. In other words, we play out an entire script in which their role is predetermined. In doing so, we are locked into a state of stagnation, the communication stalls and the relationship has little chance to evolve. In such situations, it ordinarily withers. There’s certainly no opportunity for resolution, let alone growth.

At other times, silence is used to punish. By withdrawing from the relationship silence becomes a medium for anger, also obstructing the opportunity for resolution. In such cases, silence is employed to control the other’s behavior. It mutes our thoughts and feelings, and deprives the potential for authentic dialogue. There is no possibility of resolution. Silence in these circumstances is thoroughly non-participatory.

Besides creating an obvious roadblock to the health of the relationship, silence can lead to despair and depression. I’m not referring to healthy breaks of contemplative reflection, but to the chronic struggle people have in expressing their feelings. Silence chokes the breath of relationship. Manipulative silence is soul defeating; the expressing of one’s voice is life affirming.

People who default to silence may claim, “They won’t really listen” or “They will only throw it back at me and I don’t want to fight.” Although this thinking may be understandable, it is self-injurious. We invalidate ourselves when we shut down our own articulation. Fortunately, we don’t have to remain mired in the struggle with silence as we can improve our chances of actually being heard in such circumstances. Leaning how to be heard is an acquired skill. I'll address how you can develop that ability in my next post.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

XASUUS QORKII GEES GEERIDII CIGAAL KA DIB

Xasuus Qorkii Gees Geeridii Cigaal Ka Dib Qalinkii . Maxamed Siciid Gees Samayntii Distoorka. Haddii aan halkaas kaga yara joogsano nabadayntii beelaha Soomaaliland aan wax yar ka iraahdo Dimuqraadiyentii inagoo ka bilaabayna samayntii Distoorka. Shirweynihii qaran ee Hargeysa lagu qabtay 1996waxaa barber socday Gudi ka kooban 15qof oo Shirgudoonkii shirkuu doorteen inay isku began laba distoor oo mid uu sameeyey Khabiir Soodaani ah oo markii hore loo keenay inuu la taliyo guddigii baarlamaanka ee loo magacaabay oo loo xilsaaray in ay sameeyaan distoor sidi uu Axdi qarameedkii Boorame dhigaayey. Waxaa dhacday in ay is qabteen Khabiirkii oo Madaxweyne Cigaal ku xidhnaa lagana urinayey iyo gudigiiBaarlamaanka. Sidaas darteed waxay arrintii keentay in laba distoor la soo saaro mid Khabiirkii sameeyey iyo mid Gudigii Baarlamaanku sameeyeen . Gudigaas ka koobnaa 15 qof waxay ahaayeen SH.Cabdiilaahi sh. Cali Jawhar Guddoomiye Maxamed Axmed Cabdulle Guddoomiye-ku-x

The 1969 Military Coup in Somalia. Part 1- 10. By Dr. Mohamed Rashid Sheikh Hassan. * History*

''The Military Take Over (1969 coup d'état); The Beginning of the New Era'' Forty years have passed since the military forces took over power in Somalia in a bloodless coup overthrowing the post-colonial state founded on western democratic model. I would like to assess the history and the legacy of this regime in a series of articles. The Prime Minster Mohamed Haji Ibrahim Egal was in the United States for an official visit at the time when the news of the assassination of the President, Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke reached him. The constitution of the country stated the parliament must elect a successor immediately, if such a situation arises. When the lobbying and campaigning that who would succeed the President started, it became clear that personal interests were overriding national ones and the new candidate would not be judged by his national contributions or political skills. Reports of money exchanging hands for buying voters

SABABAHA KEENA FURNIINKA QOYSKA

Iyada oo ay jiraan siyaabo badan oo keena furniinka .oo ay dad badani ku kala tageen ayaa hadana waxaynu halkan ku soo qaadan doonaa dhowr sababoodoo keena furniinka . Iyada oo aanu jirin jacayl dhaba oo ka dhaxeeya lamaanaha is qaba .hadii uu jirana laba lamaane midkoodbaa mid ka kale jecel .oo mid baa ku dulman jacaylkiisa .guurkaasina waxa uu sii jirayaa uun inta uu ka niyad jabayo qofka wax jecli ka uu jecel yahay. 2. Iyada oo aan run laga sheegin haasawaha la wadaagayo guurka hortii . oo mid waliba uu kan kale u soo bandhigayo dabeecado uu ku wanaagsan yahay .isaga oo qarinaya iinta uu mid waliba leeyahay.waxaana jira arrimo uu mid waliba si gaara u sii qariyo raga iyo dumarkuba iyada oo ay jiri karaan qodobo kale hadan laban ayaa inta badan la sheegaa inay adkaato sida looga run sheegaa.(Dumarku waxa ugu wayn ee ay qariyaan waa dabeecadeeda halka ay raguna qariyaan dhaqaalihiisa ) iyadda oo ay dhici karto in labada dhinacba lagu arko labadaa dabeecadoodba