Too Many Years Of Lies: From Mossadeq to 9/11
By Paul Craig Roberts
September 10, 2013 - Washington has been at war for 12 years. According to experts such as Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, these wars have cost Americans approximately $6 trillion, enough to keep Social Security and Medicare sound for years. All there is to show for 12 years of war is fat bank balances for the armament industries and a list of destroyed countries with millions of dead and dislocated people who never lifted a hand against the United States.
September 10, 2013 - Washington has been at war for 12 years. According to experts such as Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, these wars have cost Americans approximately $6 trillion, enough to keep Social Security and Medicare sound for years. All there is to show for 12 years of war is fat bank balances for the armament industries and a list of destroyed countries with millions of dead and dislocated people who never lifted a hand against the United States.
The cost
paid by American troops and taxpayers is extreme. Secretary of
Veteran Affairs Erik Shinseki reported in November 2009 that
“more veterans have committed suicide since 2001 than we have
lost on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.” Many
thousands of our troops have suffered amputations and traumatic
brain injuries. At the Marine Corps War College Jim Lacey
calculated that the annual cost of the Afghan war was $1.5
billion for each al-Qaeda member in Afghanistan. Many US and
coalition troops paid with their lives for every one al-Qaeda
member killed. On no basis has the war ever made sense.
Washington’s wars have destroyed the favorable image of the
United States created over the decades of the cold war. No
longer the hope of mankind, the US today is viewed as a threat
whose government cannot be trusted.
The wars
that have left America’s reputation in tatters are the
consequence of 9/11. The neoconservatives who advocate America’s
hegemony over the world called for “a new Pearl Harbor” that
would allow them to launch wars of conquest. Their plan for
conquering the Middle East as their starting point was set out
in the neoconservative “Project for the New American Century.”
It was stated clearly by Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz and
also by many neoconservatives.
The neocon
argument boils down to a claim that history has chosen
“democratic capitalism” and not Karl Marx as the future. To
comply with history’s choice, the US must beef up its military
and impose the American Way on the entire world.
In other
words, as Claes Ryn wrote, the American neoconservatives are the
“new Jacobins,” a reference to the French Revolution of 1789
that intended to overthrow aristocratic Europe and replace it
with “Liberty, equality, fraternity,” but instead gave Europe a
quarter century of war, death, and destruction.
Ideologies
are dangerous, because they are immune to facts. Now that the
United States is no longer governed by the US Constitution, but
by a crazed ideology that has given rise to a domestic police
state more complete than that of Communist East Germany and to a
warfare state that attacks sovereign countries based on nothing
but manufactured lies, we are left with the irony that Russia
and China are viewed as constraints on Washington’s ability to
inflict evil, death, and destruction on the world.
The two
pariah states of the 20th century have become the hope of
mankind in the 21st century!
As Oliver
Stone and Peter Kuznick prove in their book, The Untold History
of the United States, the American government has never deserved
its white hat reputation. Washington has been very successful in
dressing up its crimes in moralistic language and hiding them in
secrecy. It is only decades after events that the truth comes
out.
For
example, on August 19, 1953, the democratically elected
government of Iran was overthrown by a coup instigated by the US
government. Sixty years after the event declassified CIA
documents detail how the secret CIA operation overthrew a
democratic government and imposed Washington’s puppet on the
people of Iran.
The
declassified documents could not have spelled it out any
clearer: “The military coup that overthrew Mossadeq and his
National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an
act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the
highest levels of government.”
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/19/politics/cia-iran-1953-coup
In the
21st century Washington is attempting to repeat its 1953 feat of
overthrowing the Iranian government, this time using the faux
“green revolution” financed by Washington. When that fails,
Washington will rely on military action.
If 60
years is the time that must pass before Washington’s crimes can
be acknowledged, the US government will admit the truth about
September 11, 2001 on September 11, 2061. In 2013, on this 12th
anniversary of 9/11, we only have 48 years to go before
Washington admits the truth. Alas, the members of the 9/11 truth
movement will not still be alive to receive their vindication.
But just
as it has been known for decades that Washington overthrew
Mossadeq, we already know that the official story of 9/11 is
hogwash.
No
evidence exists that supports the government’s 9/11 story. The
9/11 Commission was a political gathering run by a
neoconservative White House operative. The Commission members
sat and listened to the government’s story and wrote it down. No
investigation of any kind was made. One member of the Commission
resigned, saying that the fix was in. After the report was
published, both co-chairmen of the Commission and the legal
counsel wrote books disassociating themselves from the report.
The 9/11 Commission was “set up to fail,” they wrote.
NIST’s
account of the structural failure of the twin towers is a
computer simulation based on assumptions chosen to produce the
result. NIST refuses to release its make-believe explanation for
expert scrutiny. The reason is obvious. NIST’s explanation of
the structural failure of the towers cannot survive scrutiny.
There are
many 9/11 Truth organizations whose members are high-rise
architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemists and nano-chemists,
military and civilian airline pilots, firemen and first
responders, former prominent government officials, and 9/11
families. The evidence they have amassed overwhelms the feeble
official account.
It has
been proven conclusively that World Trade Center Building 7 fell
at free fall which can only be achieved by controlled demolition
that removes all resistance below to debris falling from above
so that no time is lost in overcoming resistance from intact
structures. NIST has acknowledged this fact, but has not changed
its story.
In other
words, still in America today official denial takes precedence
over science and known undisputed facts.
On this
12th anniversary of a false flag event, it is unnecessary for me
to report the voluminous evidence that conclusively proves that
the official story is a lie. You can read it for yourself. It is
available online. You can read what the architects and engineers
have to say. You can read the scientists’ reports. You can hear
from the first responders who were in the WTC towers. You can
read the pilots who say that the maneuvers associated with the
airliner that allegedly hit the Pentagon are beyond their skills
and most certainly were not performed by inexperienced pilots.
You
can read David Griffin’s many books. You can watch the film
produced by Richard Gage and Architects & Engineers for 9/11
truth.
You can
read the 9/11 Toronto Report, International Hearings on 9/11.
You can
read this book:
Actually,
you do not need any of the expert evidence to know that the US
government’s story is false. As I have previously pointed out,
had a few young Saudi Arabians, the alleged 9/11 hijackers, been
capable of outwitting, without support from any government and
intelligence service, not only the CIA and FBI, but all sixteen
US intelligence services, the intelligence services of
Washington’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad, the National
Security Council, NORAD, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Traffic
Control, and defeat Airport Security four times in one hour on
the same morning, the White House, Congress, and the media would
have been demanding an investigation of how the National
Security State could so totally fail.
Instead,
the President of the United States and every government office
fiercely resisted any investigation. It was only after a year of
demands and rising pressure from the 9/11 families that the 9/11
Commission was created to bury the issue.
No one in
government was held accountable for the astonishing failure. The
national security state was defeated by a few rag tag Muslims
with box cutters and a sick old man dying from renal failure
while holed up in a cave in Afghanistan, and no heads rolled.
The total
absence from the government for demands for an investigation of
an event that is the greatest embarrassment to a “superpower” in
world history is a complete give-away that 9/11was a false flag
event. The government did not want any investigation, because
the government’s cover story cannot stand investigation.
The
government could rely on the mega-media corporations in whose
hands the corrupt Clinton regime concentrated the US media. By
supporting rather than investigating the government’s cover
story, the media left the majority of Americans, who are
sensitive to peer pressure, without any support for their
doubts. Effectively, the American Ministry of Propaganda
validated the government’s false story.
Common
everyday experiences of Americans refute the government’s story.
Consider, for example, self-cleaning ovens. How many American
homes have them? Thirty million? More? Do you have one?
Do you
know what temperature self-cleaning ovens reach? The
self-cleaning cycle runs for several hours at 900 degrees
Fahrenheit or 482 degrees Celsius. Does your self-cleaning oven
melt at 482 degrees Celsius. No, it doesn’t. Does the very thin,
one-eighth inch steel soften and your oven collapse? No, it
doesn’t.
Keep that
in mind while you read this: According to tests performed by
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), only 2%
of the WTC steel tested by NIST reached temperatures as high as
250 degrees Celsius, about half the temperature reached by your
self-cleaning oven. Do you believe that such low temperatures on
such small areas of the WTC towers caused the massive, thick,
steel columns in the towers to soften and permit the collapse of
the buildings? If you do, please explain why your self-cleaning
oven doesn’t weaken and collapse.
In Section
E.5 of the Executive Summary in this NIST report
http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=101019 it
says: “A method was developed using microscopic observations of
paint cracking to determine whether steel members had
experienced temperatures in excess of 250 degrees C. More than
170 areas were examined . . . Only three locations had a
positive result indicating that the steel and paint may have
reached temperatures in excess of 250 degrees C.” Analysis of
steel “microstructures show no evidence of exposure to
temperatures above 600 degrees C for any significant time.”
In section
3.6 of the NIST report http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=101019
NIST states: “NIST believes that this collection of steel
from the WTC towers is adequate for purposes of the
investigation.”
How did
these truths get out? My explanation is that the NIST
scientists, resentful of the threat to their jobs and future
employment opportunities and chaffing under the order to produce
a false report, revealed the coerced deception by including
information that their political masters did not understand. By
stating unequivocally the actual temperatures, NIST’s scientists
put the lie to the coerced report.
The
melting point of steel is around 1,500 degrees C. or 2,600
degrees F. Steel can lose strength at lower temperatures, but
the NIST scientists reported that only a small part of the steel
was even subjected to moderate temperatures less than those
obtained by the self-cleaning oven in your home.
If you
need to think about this a bit more, obtain a copy of The Making
of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes. Have a look at the
streetcar in photo 108. The caption reads: “The Hiroshima
fireball instantly raised surface temperatures within a mile of
the hypocenter well above 1,000 degrees F.” Is the streetcar a
melted lump of steel? No, it is structurally intact, although
blackened with burnt paint.
Washington
would have you believe that steel that survived intact the
atomic bomb would melt from low temperature, short lived,
isolated office fires. What do you think of a government that
believes that you are that stupid?
Who would
support a government that lies every time it opens its mouth?
The three
WTC buildings that were destroyed were massive heat sinks. I
doubt that the limited, short-lived, low temperature fires in
the buildings even warmed the massive steel structures to the
touch.
Moreover,
not a single steel column melted or deformed from softening. The
columns were severed at specific lengths by extremely high
temperature charges placed on the columns.
On this
12th anniversary of 9/11, ask yourself if you really want to
believe that temperatures half those reached by your
self-cleaning oven caused three massive steel structures to
crumble into dust.
Then ask
yourself why your government thinks you are so totally stupid as
to believe such a fairy tale as your government has told you
about 9/11.
Paul
Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for
Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal.
He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service,
and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments.
His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His
latest book, The
Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of
the West is now available.
Comments
Post a Comment